Skip to content

docs: point pybgl links to Bitgesell repository#5

Open
tolga-tom-nook wants to merge 1 commit into
BitgesellOfficial:masterfrom
tolga-tom-nook:fix/repository-links
Open

docs: point pybgl links to Bitgesell repository#5
tolga-tom-nook wants to merge 1 commit into
BitgesellOfficial:masterfrom
tolga-tom-nook:fix/repository-links

Conversation

@tolga-tom-nook

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Updates README/install docs/Sphinx GitHub metadata to point to the current BitgesellOfficial/pybgl repository.
  • Replaces stale bitaps-com/pybgl clone, issue tracker, and package URL references with the canonical Bitgesell repo.

Validation

  • python3 -m compileall -q pybgl
  • stale-link scan for bitaps-com/pybgl in README/setup/docs returned no matches
  • git diff --check

Bounty context: submitted for the Bitgesell improvement/PR bounty program (#81 / #39). If accepted, payout address: 0x4a76c7E64C08cF29B59eFC640b4ada97A270d428 (EVM/USDT-compatible).

@MyTH-zyxeon

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review assist for maintainers:

This looks like a narrow docs/metadata retarget from the legacy bitaps-com host to the current BitgesellOfficial pybgl repository. I checked the patch scope: README install instructions, Sphinx GitHub banner metadata, docs source/index links, docs installation clone URL, and setup.py package URL all move to the official org without changing runtime code.

Suggested merge checks:

  • Search the touched docs/package metadata for bitaps-com/pybgl and confirm no stale project URL remains in those files.
  • Build the Sphinx docs, or at least render the index/install pages, so the new GitHub link target and HTTPS clone snippets display correctly.
  • Inspect package metadata after setup.py parsing to confirm the PyPI/project URL now points at https://github.com/BitgesellOfficial/pybgl.

I do not see a code-path or dependency risk in this patch as written; the main acceptance criterion is that generated docs/package metadata stop sending users to the old repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants