OpenSpec New Tool Integration Proposal

[ashokkumarsf3822-design]

Hi OpenSpec team! 👋

I'm reaching out to propose adding [Tool Name]
as an officially supported tool within the OpenSpec framework.

Questions & Guidance Needed

Before proceeding with implementation, I would greatly appreciate guidance on the following:

1. Implementation guidance: Are there any specific patterns, conventions, or
   architectural requirements I should follow when implementing this integration?

2. Reference examples: Which recently merged tool integration PR would be the best
   reference to study? (e.g., similar tool structure or configuration)

3. PR Review process: Who should I tag or notify when the pull request is ready
   for review? Are there specific maintainers who handle tool integration reviews?

4. Testing requirements: What testing standards should be met before submitting
   the PR?

I look forward to contributing to OpenSpec and helping expand its tool ecosystem.

[clay-good]

Closing as unactionable — the template placeholder [Tool Name] was never filled in, so there's no specific integration to give guidance on.

For anyone landing here wanting to add a tool, the answers are:

1. Pattern — adapters live in src/core/configurators/; pick the closest existing one and mirror it. The generated file layout for every supported tool is tabulated in Supported Tools.
2. Reference PR — any recently merged adapter (Trae, Pi, Kimi) is a good model; each is a single adapter file plus a row in the supported-tools table plus tests.
3. Review — just open the PR, no tagging needed.
4. Testing — npm run build then vitest run; tests run against dist/, so build first.

Please open a fresh discussion or PR naming the actual tool and we'll take it from there.