Add a Benchmark for Planning Extension Nodes

[tschwarzinger]

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

Currently, as far as I am concerned, there are no benchmarks that focus on the planning of custom query plans. This issue tracks adding such a benchmark.

Describe the solution you'd like

I think we should have an extension_planner (or similar) file with the following things:

• An ExtensionPlanner that implements a custom version of some built-in operator (e.g., a special node for doing a common projection in a system)
• A benchmark that plans the custom logical plan
• A benchmark that achieves the same goal using a built-in operator
• Quite likely more (e.g., planning of extension types etc.)

This should allow us to compare the overhead of planning an extension logical plan versus built-in logical plans. Ideally, we should try to get this down to "zero", such that custom plans do not suffer from any drawbacks.

Describe alternatives you've considered

• Let downstream projects find the performance regressions ;)

Additional context

This issue was raised in #23157

I am quite busy till end of July, but I'll try to add such a benchmark afterwards if no one beats me to it.

[BipashaBi]

take