[Feature] V2: economic simulation for registration/reveal windows, minimum bond, and whale-capture risk

[collinsezedike]

Summary

V2's parameters (registration duration, reveal duration, minimum resolution bond, anti-sniping extension) are currently reasoned about qualitatively in docs/src/V2_RESOLUTION.md, not modeled quantitatively. This is a research/design issue, not implementation: model the tradeoffs before picking real deployment defaults.

Scope

• Model default frequency: given plausible turnout distributions, how often does a genuinely wrong assertion survive via the optimistic timeout default purely because turnout was too low? (This is the same dynamic worked through in [Feature] V2: implement weighted-majority outcome resolution #68's issue body, e.g. 49% revealed against, 50% non-reveal, assertion still stands.)
• Model whale-capture risk: at what concentration of eligible capital does a single address or coalition reliably reach strict majority on a typical-sized dispute, given the minimum resolution bond from [Feature] V2: implement PolicySnapshot and versioned assertion state #64?
• Model window-length tradeoffs: how does registration/reveal duration trade off against genuine participation (longer windows let more people join, but delay resolution and give more time for coordinated capture).
• Recommend concrete starting parameter values, following the same profile-based approach docs/src/BOND_SIZING.md already established for v1 (private beta / public testnet / higher-value mainnet candidate).
• Output: a new docs/src/V2_BOND_SIZING.md (or an extension of the existing one) with the model and recommended profiles, in the same style as the v1 document.

Depends on

Conceptually depends on #64's parameter list existing, but can proceed in parallel with implementation since this is modeling, not code against a live contract.

[Chigybillionz]

I can take this up and deliver a fix. Please assign. 🙏🙏🙏

[grantfox-oss]

🦊 GrantFox — @Chigybillionz has been assigned to this issue!

Next steps:

1. Open a Pull Request referencing this issue (e.g., Closes #75)
2. Your PR will be reviewed by the drydocs maintainers

Good luck! Track your progress on GrantFox.

[collinsezedike]

Assigned, thanks for taking this one. It's a modeling/docs issue, not code against a live contract, so feel free to work from V2_RESOLUTION.md and BOND_SIZING.md as your starting references.