PORTO Software Architectural Pattern can be the best for project objectives?

[andrekutianski]

Is PORTO like suggested SAP can be the best to accomplish the DynaBill objectives?

[andrekutianski]

One of the interesting thing about the SAP PORTO is the "Monolithic to "Micro" Services"

Porto is designed to scale with you! While most companies shift from Monolithic to Micro-Services (and most recently Serverless) as they scale up. Porto offers the flexibility to deflate your Monolithic into Micro-Services (or SOA) at any time with the least effort possible.
In Porto terms a Monolithic is equal to one cargo ship of Containers, while Micro Services is equal to multiple cargo ships of Containers. (Disregarding their sizes).
Porto offers the flexibility to start small with a single well organized Monolithic service and grow whenever you need, by extracting containers into multiple services as your team grows.
This is possible because Porto organizes your code into Containers, which are grouped into isolated Sections. A section can be later extracted out with all it's related containers to be depolyed separatly as you scale.