From 4a92559234720f7766d0b21feb239b704417e64b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: flinguen Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 11:44:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Leap exercise, fix misprint --- .../practice/leap/.approaches/logical-expression/content.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/exercises/practice/leap/.approaches/logical-expression/content.md b/exercises/practice/leap/.approaches/logical-expression/content.md index 2c99da84d..39cff1bcc 100644 --- a/exercises/practice/leap/.approaches/logical-expression/content.md +++ b/exercises/practice/leap/.approaches/logical-expression/content.md @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ We say that the `*` operator has _higher [precedence][wikipedia-precedence]_ tha In logic similar ambiguities exist, and these are similarly resolved. By convention – and so in Haskell – -- _and_ has higher precedence than _or_, and +- _and_ has higher precedence than _or_. - _not_ has higher precedence than both _and_ and _or_. For example, `p || q && r` means the same as `p || (q && r)`.