Current Limitation
The current tdoc schema stores problem-related data through separate fields:
pids: Array of problem IDs
score: Fullmark value
balloon: Balloon color information
This structure don't support the customization of problem titles and labels (e.g., "A,B,C", "L1-1,L1-2", "A,B1,B2" formats).
Proposed Solution
Introduce a structured problems array field with enhanced flexibility:
export interface Tdoc extends Document {
// ...
problems: {
pid: number;
label: string; // Custom label (required)
title?: string; // Optional custom title
score?: number; // Optional score override
balloon?: string | { color: string, name: string }; // Optional balloon customization
}[];
// ...
}
Backward Compatibility
- Maintain existing fields (
pids, score, balloon) during transition
- Implement synchronization mechanism between legacy fields and new structure
- Add deprecation warnings for legacy fields
Feedback Request
Would the maintainers consider accepting this change? If so, I'm willing to try to work on this task.
I understand this represents a significant change - would you prefer this approach over maintaining the current schema?
Current Limitation
The current
tdocschema stores problem-related data through separate fields:pids: Array of problem IDsscore: Fullmark valueballoon: Balloon color informationThis structure don't support the customization of problem titles and labels (e.g., "A,B,C", "L1-1,L1-2", "A,B1,B2" formats).
Proposed Solution
Introduce a structured
problemsarray field with enhanced flexibility:Backward Compatibility
pids,score,balloon) during transitionFeedback Request
Would the maintainers consider accepting this change? If so, I'm willing to try to work on this task.
I understand this represents a significant change - would you prefer this approach over maintaining the current schema?