Skip to content

Implement semantics for provisionals #212

Description

@JonatanWaern

Group issue for provisional semantic implementation

In general:

  • We always need to support new syntax for provisionals
  • We should probably warn/error if the new syntax is used without the provisional declaration
  • We do not need to speculatively enforce restrictions imposed by provisionals I don't think, this can probably wait until they are stablized

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions