You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This vote proposes accepting the Lance 2.3 SparseLayout wire contract. It represents sparse nested structure with semantic position/count sets, supports both null-position and valid-position validity encodings, and stores only visible leaf values while preserving Arrow null/empty semantics. It is gated to Lance 2.3 and does not change Lance 2.2.
Per the Lance voting process, this requires 3 binding +1 votes from PMC members, excluding the proposer, and a minimum voting period of one week. Please vote +1, 0, or -1 and mark the vote binding or non-binding; -1 votes must include justification.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This vote proposes accepting the Lance 2.3
SparseLayoutwire contract. It represents sparse nested structure with semantic position/count sets, supports both null-position and valid-position validity encodings, and stores only visible leaf values while preserving Arrow null/empty semantics. It is gated to Lance 2.3 and does not change Lance 2.2.Proposal: #7631
PR: #7754
Per the Lance voting process, this requires 3 binding +1 votes from PMC members, excluding the proposer, and a minimum voting period of one week. Please vote +1, 0, or -1 and mark the vote binding or non-binding; -1 votes must include justification.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions