Skip to content

Conversation

@arnetheduck
Copy link
Contributor

The forward declarations cause Exception to be inferred - also, llrecv is an internal implementation detail and the type of the received item is controlled by generics, thus the ValueError raised there seems out of place for the generic api.

The forward declarations cause `Exception` to be inferred - also,
`llrecv` is an internal implementation detail and the type of the
received item is controlled by generics, thus the ValueError raised
there seems out of place for the generic api.
@arnetheduck
Copy link
Contributor Author

remaining fails look unrelated

@Araq Araq closed this Dec 1, 2025
@Araq Araq reopened this Dec 1, 2025
@Araq Araq added the merge_when_passes_CI mergeable once green label Dec 1, 2025
@arnetheduck
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @narimiran pls backport

@Araq Araq merged commit 91febf1 into nim-lang:devel Dec 1, 2025
30 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Thanks for your hard work on this PR!
The lines below are statistics of the Nim compiler built from 91febf1

Hint: mm: orc; opt: speed; options: -d:release
190319 lines; 10.815s; 816.117MiB peakmem

narimiran pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2025
The forward declarations cause `Exception` to be inferred - also,
`llrecv` is an internal implementation detail and the type of the
received item is controlled by generics, thus the ValueError raised
there seems out of place for the generic api.

(cherry picked from commit 91febf1)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merge_when_passes_CI mergeable once green

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants