Fix new specs on CRuby CI

Author: andrykonchin

core/proc/syntax_tree_spec.rb

@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ def return_block(&b)
     end
 
     it "does not return implicit parameter nodes" do
-      suppress_warning do eval <<~RUBY # ruby_version_is ""..."3.4"
       # Interesting because the BlockNode and the ItParametersNode/NumberedParametersNode are fully overlapping
       node = -> { it }.syntax_tree
       node.start_line.should == __LINE__ - 1
@@ -51,8 +50,6 @@ def return_block(&b)
       node = proc { _1 }.syntax_tree
       node.start_line.should == __LINE__ - 1
       node.should.is_a?(Prism::CallNode)
-      RUBY
-      end
     end
 
     it "returns a ForNode for a for-loop block" do

core/thread/backtrace/location/source_range_spec.rb

@@ -301,13 +301,13 @@ def value.to_a = 1
       RUBY
 
       "class with rescue" => [<<-RUBY, :ClassNode],
-      SourceRangeClass = 1
-      $class SourceRangeClass; rescue; end$
+      SourceRangeClassSpecs = 1
+      $class SourceRangeClassSpecs; rescue; end$
       RUBY
 
       "module with rescue" => [<<-RUBY, :ModuleNode],
-      SourceRangeModule = 1
-      $module SourceRangeModule; rescue; end$
+      SourceRangeModuleSpecs = 1
+      $module SourceRangeModuleSpecs; rescue; end$
       RUBY
 
       # These nodes can own real calls, so source-range lookup cannot always exclude their classes.

default.mspec

@@ -50,5 +50,6 @@ class MSpecScript
     /\wSpecs?$/,
     /^CS_CONST/,
     /^CSL_CONST/,
+    /^Prism$/,
   ]
 end