bench: refactor to use dynamic memory allocation in strided/base/smskmap

[Omar-2718]

… with dynamic memory allocation

Resolves #{{TODO: add issue number}}.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• replace static memory allocation of large arrays in C benchmarks with dynamic memory allocation (tracking issue)

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• [RFC]: replace static memory allocation of large arrays in C benchmarks with dynamic memory allocation (tracking issue) #8643

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

{{TODO: add disclosure if applicable}}

Just getting the linter to work And asking questions about the project
@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
strided/base/smskmap	$\color{green}224/224$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}10/10$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}224/224$ $\color{green}+0.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[kgryte]

LGTM