Conversation
| }, | ||
| // xdai | ||
| 100: { | ||
| masterCopyAddress: '0x6851D6fDFAfD08c0295C392436245E5bc78B0185', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why do we not use the official mastercopy on xdai?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wait, those are not the official addresses? I got them from https://github.com/gnosis/safe-contracts/blob/development/networks.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ahhh you use the v1.2.0 address ... then I would update this everywhere, not just for xdai. You should check by tag
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's fine. The rest of the networks are updated here: #126
| masterCopyAddress: '0x6851D6fDFAfD08c0295C392436245E5bc78B0185', | ||
| proxyFactoryAddress: '0xfC7577774887aAE7bAcdf0Fc8ce041DA0b3200f7', | ||
| multiSendAddress: '0x8D29bE29923b68abfDD21e541b9374737B49cdAD', | ||
| fallbackHandlerAddress: '0xd5D82B6aDDc9027B22dCA772Aa68D5d74cdBdF44' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why do we not use the official fallback handler on xdai?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rmeissner Is not this the right one? https://github.com/gnosis/safe-contracts/blob/v1.2.0/networks.json#L118
From where did we get the fallback handler at 0x40A930851BD2e590Bd5A5C981b436de25742E980 for the other networks?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
so this seems to be the 1.1.1 fallback handler and the other is 1.1.0 (as mentioned on etherscan). Note 1.1.1 is the current. Code wise 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 should be the same.
See https://etherscan.io/address/0x40A930851BD2e590Bd5A5C981b436de25742E980
and https://etherscan.io/address/0xd5D82B6aDDc9027B22dCA772Aa68D5d74cdBdF44
truffle-config.js
Outdated
| [5, 'goerli', `${2e9}`], | ||
| [42, 'kovan'], | ||
| ].map(([networkId, network, gasPrice]) => ({ | ||
| [77, 'sokol',, true], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note: we do not have sokol in the networks file
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we want to create a "Sokol deployment PR" or remove this?
3 participants
Closes #111