-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
Aci link level flow control (DCNE-595) #1413
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
c8cf587 to
2b7fb8d
Compare
sajagana
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
samiib
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
gmicol
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
shrsr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (rebase required)
…ss policy with resource aci_link_level_control_flow_interface_policy
2b7fb8d to
2142500
Compare
shrsr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
sajagana
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
| * `annotation` (annotation) - (string) The annotation of the Link Level Flow Control Interface Policy object. | ||
| - Default: `"orchestrator:terraform"` | ||
| * `description` (descr) - (string) The description of the Link Level Flow Control Interface Policy object. | ||
| * `receive_mode` (llfcRcvAdminSt) - (string) The receive mode of the Link Level Flow Control Interface Policy object. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should these be receive state or similar? To me using mode implies there are multiple options instead of on or off.
The UI says Receive/Send Flow Control. I think either receive_flow_control or receive_state?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To me the terminology of state could imply that it could be multiple options this is why I chose mode. But I guess it it is interpretation specific. Changed to state now, because I do not like the flow_control behind receive since it is already in the object/resource name.
9077aeb to
62a3f62
Compare
sajagana
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
samiib
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
No description provided.