Skip to content

Conversation

@soujay
Copy link

@soujay soujay commented Dec 9, 2025

No description provided.

@prmerger-automator
Copy link
Contributor

@soujay : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 6bbb2ab:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/service-bus-messaging/message-transfers-locks-settlement.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@soujay soujay marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2025 07:33
@soujay soujay changed the title Added a note on the importance of idempotent message handling and lin… Added a note on the importance of idempotent message handling and linked to article Dec 9, 2025
@v-dirichards v-dirichards requested a review from Copilot December 9, 2025 15:43
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds documentation emphasizing the importance of idempotent message handling in Azure Service Bus messaging scenarios, specifically in the context of duplicate message detection and handling.

Key Changes:

  • Added a note linking to an external article about idempotency in distributed systems

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.


The typical mechanism for identifying duplicate message deliveries is by checking the `message-id`, which can and should be set by the sender to a unique value, possibly aligned with an identifier from the originating process. A job scheduler would likely set the `message-id` to the identifier of the job it's trying to assign to a worker with the given worker, and the worker would ignore the second occurrence of the job assignment if that job is already done.

This is where designing for idempotent message handling becomes critical. For practical techniques and examples of how to achieve idempotency in distributed systems, see this guide: [What Does Idempotent Mean?](https://particular.net/blog/what-does-idempotent-mean)
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The added note references an external third-party blog (particular.net) which may not align with Microsoft documentation standards. Consider either: (1) linking to official Microsoft documentation on idempotency if available, (2) incorporating the key concepts directly into this article, or (3) adding a disclaimer that this is third-party content. External links can break over time and may not receive the same maintenance as Microsoft documentation.

Suggested change
This is where designing for idempotent message handling becomes critical. For practical techniques and examples of how to achieve idempotency in distributed systems, see this guide: [What Does Idempotent Mean?](https://particular.net/blog/what-does-idempotent-mean)
This is where designing for idempotent message handling becomes critical. Idempotency means that processing the same message more than once produces the same result as processing it once, which helps prevent duplicate work or inconsistent state in distributed systems. When building message handlers, ensure that operations can safely be retried or repeated without adverse effects.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@spelluru

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Dec 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants