Skip to content

[18.0][ADD] base_sequence_template#3525

Open
LauraCForgeFlow wants to merge 1 commit intoOCA:18.0from
ForgeFlow:18.0-add-base_sequence_multi_company_template
Open

[18.0][ADD] base_sequence_template#3525
LauraCForgeFlow wants to merge 1 commit intoOCA:18.0from
ForgeFlow:18.0-add-base_sequence_multi_company_template

Conversation

@LauraCForgeFlow
Copy link

No description provided.

@LauraCForgeFlow LauraCForgeFlow force-pushed the 18.0-add-base_sequence_multi_company_template branch from 474caf3 to c5b8b8c Compare February 24, 2026 07:09
Copy link
Contributor

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Some suggestions to improve:

  • add a smart button to see the generated sequences from the template:
Image
  • add button in form view:
Image
  • add button in tree view (we can save the additional click on "actions")
Image

Also, the name of the module could be just base_sequence_template, I don't see a reason to add the multi_company in the name as it is not extending base_multi_company or anything related. You are adding sequence templates that works with one or multiple companies like many standard modules. WDYT?

@LauraCForgeFlow LauraCForgeFlow force-pushed the 18.0-add-base_sequence_multi_company_template branch from c5b8b8c to fbace80 Compare February 24, 2026 12:34
@LauraCForgeFlow LauraCForgeFlow changed the title [18.0][ADD] base_sequence_multi_company_template [18.0][ADD] base_sequence_template Feb 24, 2026
@LauraCForgeFlow
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the suggestions @LoisRForgeFlow! I completely agree, I have implemented the changes you proposed.

Copy link
Contributor

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome! LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants