Skip to content

Add Sentinel v2.4 AGI/ASI Governance Technical Report (2026–2035) - #148

Merged
OneFineStarstuff merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/develop-agi/asi-governance-roadmap
Aug 17, 2026
Merged

Add Sentinel v2.4 AGI/ASI Governance Technical Report (2026–2035)#148
OneFineStarstuff merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/develop-agi/asi-governance-roadmap

Conversation

@OneFineStarstuff

@OneFineStarstuff OneFineStarstuff commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Motivation

  • Provide a regulator-ready reference architecture and implementation roadmap for enterprise AGI/ASI governance covering 2026–2035.
  • Unify technical building blocks and assurance patterns including Sentinel v2.4, WorkflowAI Pro, G-Stack, Omni-Sentinel, GAI-SOC, ZK proofs, PQC WORM logging, TLA+, OPA/Rego, Circom/Groth16, and GC-IR bridges.
  • Supply machine-readable control catalogs, OSCAL profiles, BBOM/evidence schemas, and board/regulator-ready runbooks for production readiness and auditability.

Description

  • Add a comprehensive document at docs/governance/AGI_ASI_GOVERNANCE_REGULATORY_TECHNICAL_REPORT_2026_2035.md containing scope, roles, logical planes, component responsibilities, and architecture diagrams.
  • Include formal artifacts and examples such as a TLA+ containment module (SentinelContainment), OPA/Rego policy (sentinel.release), Circom circuit (SystemicRiskThreshold), BBOM and evidence envelope schemas, and a sample AutonomousSupervisoryAgent Python snippet.
  • Embed CI/gate examples and guidance showing opa test, opa eval, tla2tools check, and python docs/schemas/run_governance_checks.py, plus Kafka/PQC WORM audit topic models and a ZK proof workflow (Circom/Groth16 and zk-STARK migration notes).
  • Add operational artifacts including a phased implementation roadmap, Red Dawn simulation manifests, ADRs, production readiness checklist, repository layout, and board-level success metrics.

Testing

  • No automated tests were executed as part of this PR because the change is documentation-only and adds the technical report file.
  • The document includes example automated checks and CI steps that should be executed in CI, namely opa test / opa eval, tla2tools check, and python docs/schemas/run_governance_checks.py.

Codex Task

Summary by Sourcery

Add the Sentinel v2.4 AGI/ASI governance blueprint and supporting assurance artifacts for regulator-ready enterprise deployment through 2035.

New Features:

  • Add a regulator-ready technical blueprint for enterprise AGI/ASI governance spanning architecture, controls, assurance, containment, and a 2026–2035 implementation roadmap.

Enhancements:

  • Define reference roles, governance planes, regulatory control mappings, formal safety invariants, compliance-as-code patterns, evidence pipelines, privacy-preserving proof workflows, supervisory-agent boundaries, and production-readiness requirements.

Documentation:

  • Document Red Dawn simulations, safety cases, implementation epics, architecture decisions, machine-readable OSCAL/control and BBOM artifacts, regulator reporting templates, and board-level success metrics.

Tests:

  • Include example validation and CI checks for OPA policies, TLA+ containment invariants, and governance schema checks; no automated tests were run because the change is documentation-only.

@semanticdiff-com

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

@code-genius-code-coverage

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
v0-one-fine-starstuff-github-io Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 17, 2026 4:56pm

@difflens

difflens Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View changes in DiffLens

@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Reviewer's Guide

Adds a single large technical report markdown file describing the Sentinel v2.4 AGI/ASI governance reference architecture, including control catalogs, formal methods, policies, ZK proof workflows, operational roadmaps, and regulatory alignment for 2026–2035.

Sequence diagram for sentinel-governance-gate CI pipeline

sequenceDiagram
  participant Dev as Developer
  participant GitHub as GitHubActions
  participant OPA as OPA_CLI
  participant TLA as tla2tools
  participant GOV as run_governance_checks_py

  Dev->>GitHub: open pull_request
  GitHub->>OPA: opa test policies/ docs/schemas/policies/
  OPA-->>GitHub: test results
  GitHub->>OPA: opa eval --fail-defined 'data.sentinel.release.deny[_]'
  OPA-->>GitHub: deny findings (if any)
  GitHub->>TLA: tla2tools check SentinelContainmentProtocol.tla
  TLA-->>GitHub: model_check results
  GitHub->>GOV: python docs/schemas/run_governance_checks.py
  GOV-->>GitHub: governance_checks summary
  GitHub-->>Dev: pass/fail status for sentinel-governance-gate
Loading

Flow diagram for G-SRI ZK proof generation and regulatory reporting

flowchart TD
  A["GStack\nSigned telemetry and BBOM data"] --> B["WitnessBuilder\nCompute G_SRI factors and thresholds"]
  B --> C["Groth16Prover\nGenerate proof and publicSignals"]
  C --> D["GC_IR_Bridge\nMap proof to regulator_profile"]
  D --> E["RegulatorVerifier\nVerify proof and record OSCAL result"]
  E --> F["BoardRegulatorPlane\nMinimum_disclosure assessment"]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Introduce a regulator-focused AGI/ASI governance blueprint document for Sentinel v2.4 covering architecture, controls, and implementation roadmap.
  • Define scope, threat model, roles, and multi-plane Sentinel/WorkflowAI/Omni-Sentinel/G-Stack governance architecture with component responsibilities.
  • Document control catalog structure, OSCAL profiles, BBOM/evidence schemas, and regulatory mappings across EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001, Basel/SR 11-7/26-2, DORA/NIS2, and other regimes.
  • Provide formal artifacts and examples including TLA+ containment invariants, OPA/Rego release policy, Circom/Groth16 systemic-risk circuit, Kafka/PQC WORM audit topic model, and ZK proof workflow for systemic-risk and compute-governance assurance.
  • Describe CI/CD governance gates and operational processes such as opa/tla2tools/python checks, Red Dawn simulations, Autonomous Supervisory Agent behavior, implementation epics, roadmap phases, and production readiness checklist.
  • Supply templates and reference layouts for regulator reports, repository structure, Red Dawn manifests, safety-case structure, ADRs, and board-level success metrics for 2026–2035.
docs/governance/AGI_ASI_GOVERNANCE_REGULATORY_TECHNICAL_REPORT_2026_2035.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review available on request

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Reviews should be triggered manually for repositories with fewer than 10 stars. Select Trigger review above or comment @coderabbitai review to review the latest changes. For a full review, comment @coderabbitai full review.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 7edc262c-3080-4cf2-bb91-bbc28aa6b006


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 17, 2026
@gitnotebooks

gitnotebooks Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for onefinestarstuff canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ce8d7c9
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/onefinestarstuff/deploys/6a833d1f9a64010008719ef3

@deepsource-io

deepsource-io Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

DeepSource Code Review

We reviewed changes in c188087...ce8d7c9 on this pull request. Below is the summary for the review, and you can see the individual issues we found as inline review comments.

See full review on DeepSource ↗

PR Report Card

Overall Grade   Security  

Reliability  

Complexity  

Hygiene  

Code Review Summary

Analyzer Status Updated (UTC) Details
Python Aug 17, 2026 4:55p.m. Review ↗
JavaScript Aug 17, 2026 4:55p.m. Review ↗
Shell Aug 17, 2026 4:55p.m. Review ↗

Important

AI Review is run only on demand for your team. We're only showing results of static analysis review right now. To trigger AI Review, comment @deepsourcebot review on this thread.

@difflens

difflens Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View changes in DiffLens

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

  • The top-level <title>, <abstract>, and <content> elements at the start of the document will be treated as raw HTML by most Markdown renderers; consider either wrapping these examples in fenced code blocks or converting them to standard Markdown headings so the report renders consistently with the rest of the docs.
  • There are a few inconsistencies between example file/policy names and paths (e.g., package sentinel.release vs policies/release.rego, CI running opa test policies/ docs/schemas/policies/ when the repo layout later uses policies/ only); aligning these names and paths will make it easier for readers to copy the examples into a working implementation.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- The top-level `<title>`, `<abstract>`, and `<content>` elements at the start of the document will be treated as raw HTML by most Markdown renderers; consider either wrapping these examples in fenced code blocks or converting them to standard Markdown headings so the report renders consistently with the rest of the docs.
- There are a few inconsistencies between example file/policy names and paths (e.g., `package sentinel.release` vs `policies/release.rego`, CI running `opa test policies/ docs/schemas/policies/` when the repo layout later uses `policies/` only); aligning these names and paths will make it easier for readers to copy the examples into a working implementation.

Fix all in Cursor


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@difflens

difflens Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View changes in DiffLens

@difflens

difflens Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View changes in DiffLens

@codacy-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Not up to standards ⛔

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@OneFineStarstuff
OneFineStarstuff merged commit 742abfc into main Aug 17, 2026
44 of 51 checks passed
@OneFineStarstuff
OneFineStarstuff deleted the codex/develop-agi/asi-governance-roadmap branch August 17, 2026 16:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

codex documentation Improvements or additions to documentation size/XL

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants