Add Sentinel v2.4 AGI/ASI Governance Technical Report (2026–2035) - #148
Conversation
|
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
View changes in DiffLens |
Reviewer's GuideAdds a single large technical report markdown file describing the Sentinel v2.4 AGI/ASI governance reference architecture, including control catalogs, formal methods, policies, ZK proof workflows, operational roadmaps, and regulatory alignment for 2026–2035. Sequence diagram for sentinel-governance-gate CI pipelinesequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant GitHub as GitHubActions
participant OPA as OPA_CLI
participant TLA as tla2tools
participant GOV as run_governance_checks_py
Dev->>GitHub: open pull_request
GitHub->>OPA: opa test policies/ docs/schemas/policies/
OPA-->>GitHub: test results
GitHub->>OPA: opa eval --fail-defined 'data.sentinel.release.deny[_]'
OPA-->>GitHub: deny findings (if any)
GitHub->>TLA: tla2tools check SentinelContainmentProtocol.tla
TLA-->>GitHub: model_check results
GitHub->>GOV: python docs/schemas/run_governance_checks.py
GOV-->>GitHub: governance_checks summary
GitHub-->>Dev: pass/fail status for sentinel-governance-gate
Flow diagram for G-SRI ZK proof generation and regulatory reportingflowchart TD
A["GStack\nSigned telemetry and BBOM data"] --> B["WitnessBuilder\nCompute G_SRI factors and thresholds"]
B --> C["Groth16Prover\nGenerate proof and publicSignals"]
C --> D["GC_IR_Bridge\nMap proof to regulator_profile"]
D --> E["RegulatorVerifier\nVerify proof and record OSCAL result"]
E --> F["BoardRegulatorPlane\nMinimum_disclosure assessment"]
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Important Review available on request
Reviews should be triggered manually for repositories with fewer than 10 stars. Select Trigger review above or comment ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Review these changes at https://app.gitnotebooks.com/OneFineStarstuff/OneFineStarstuff.github.io/pull/148 |
✅ Deploy Preview for onefinestarstuff canceled.
|
|
|
Overall Grade |
Security Reliability Complexity Hygiene |
Code Review Summary
| Analyzer | Status | Updated (UTC) | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python | Aug 17, 2026 4:55p.m. | Review ↗ | |
| JavaScript | Aug 17, 2026 4:55p.m. | Review ↗ | |
| Shell | Aug 17, 2026 4:55p.m. | Review ↗ |
Important
AI Review is run only on demand for your team. We're only showing results of static analysis review right now. To trigger AI Review, comment @deepsourcebot review on this thread.
|
View changes in DiffLens |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've left some high level feedback:
- The top-level
<title>,<abstract>, and<content>elements at the start of the document will be treated as raw HTML by most Markdown renderers; consider either wrapping these examples in fenced code blocks or converting them to standard Markdown headings so the report renders consistently with the rest of the docs. - There are a few inconsistencies between example file/policy names and paths (e.g.,
package sentinel.releasevspolicies/release.rego, CI runningopa test policies/ docs/schemas/policies/when the repo layout later usespolicies/only); aligning these names and paths will make it easier for readers to copy the examples into a working implementation.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The top-level `<title>`, `<abstract>`, and `<content>` elements at the start of the document will be treated as raw HTML by most Markdown renderers; consider either wrapping these examples in fenced code blocks or converting them to standard Markdown headings so the report renders consistently with the rest of the docs.
- There are a few inconsistencies between example file/policy names and paths (e.g., `package sentinel.release` vs `policies/release.rego`, CI running `opa test policies/ docs/schemas/policies/` when the repo layout later uses `policies/` only); aligning these names and paths will make it easier for readers to copy the examples into a working implementation.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
|
View changes in DiffLens |
|
View changes in DiffLens |
Not up to standards ⛔🟢 Issues
|
Motivation
Description
docs/governance/AGI_ASI_GOVERNANCE_REGULATORY_TECHNICAL_REPORT_2026_2035.mdcontaining scope, roles, logical planes, component responsibilities, and architecture diagrams.SentinelContainment), OPA/Rego policy (sentinel.release), Circom circuit (SystemicRiskThreshold), BBOM and evidence envelope schemas, and a sampleAutonomousSupervisoryAgentPython snippet.opa test,opa eval,tla2tools check, andpython docs/schemas/run_governance_checks.py, plus Kafka/PQC WORM audit topic models and a ZK proof workflow (Circom/Groth16 and zk-STARK migration notes).Testing
opa test/opa eval,tla2tools check, andpython docs/schemas/run_governance_checks.py.Codex Task
Summary by Sourcery
Add the Sentinel v2.4 AGI/ASI governance blueprint and supporting assurance artifacts for regulator-ready enterprise deployment through 2035.
New Features:
Enhancements:
Documentation:
Tests: