Skip to content

Nightly Automation to test the latest k8s for kapp-ctrl#1786

Open
CodesbyUnnati wants to merge 1 commit intocarvel-dev:developfrom
CodesbyUnnati:add-nightly-build-automation
Open

Nightly Automation to test the latest k8s for kapp-ctrl#1786
CodesbyUnnati wants to merge 1 commit intocarvel-dev:developfrom
CodesbyUnnati:add-nightly-build-automation

Conversation

@CodesbyUnnati
Copy link
Member

@CodesbyUnnati CodesbyUnnati commented Feb 10, 2026

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR adds workflow files that will be used to test kapp-controller against latest k8s release and a minimum supported version release.

This will be an automation which will be triggered at 2am everyday and run kapp-controller tests on the latest kubernetes kind node image generated from the latest commit of that branch.

Passed Job on Fork PR-https://github.com/CodesbyUnnati/kapp-controller/actions/runs/22043017273
Kind packages-https://github.com/CodesbyUnnati/kapp-controller/pkgs/container/kindest-node

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes # #1787

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


Additional Notes for your reviewer:

Review Checklist:
  • Follows the developer guidelines
  • Relevant tests are added or updated
  • Relevant docs in this repo added or updated
  • Relevant carvel.dev docs added or updated in a separate PR and there's
    a link to that PR
  • Code is at least as readable and maintainable as it was before this
    change

Additional documentation e.g., Proposal, usage docs, etc.:


Signed-off-by: Unnati Mishra <unnati.mishra@broadcom.com>

Bump the script parameters to remove secret name of fork repo

Signed-off-by: Unnati Mishra <unnati.mishra@broadcom.com>
@CodesbyUnnati CodesbyUnnati force-pushed the add-nightly-build-automation branch from 2fd9f3d to b7bb309 Compare February 16, 2026 07:17
@CodesbyUnnati
Copy link
Member Author

@devanshuVmware Need your reviews.

env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
TIMESTAMP: ${{ needs.resolve-versions.outputs.timestamp }}
TAGS_TO_TEST: "v0.59.1 v0.58.2"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: can we resolve this dynamically as well?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants