Skip to content

[]feat[backend] auto task op#435

Open
Ev4nFeng wants to merge 7 commits intomainfrom
feat/auto_task_pipeline
Open

[]feat[backend] auto task op#435
Ev4nFeng wants to merge 7 commits intomainfrom
feat/auto_task_pipeline

Conversation

@Ev4nFeng
Copy link
Collaborator

What type of PR is this?

Check the PR title

  • This PR title match the format: [<type>][<scope>] <description>. For example: [fix][backend] flaky fix
  • The description of this PR title is user-oriented and clear enough for others to understand.
  • Add documentation if the current PR requires user awareness at the usage level.
  • This PR is written in English. PRs not in English will not be reviewed.

(Optional) Translate the PR title into Chinese

(Optional) More detailed description for this PR(en: English/zh: Chinese)

en:
zh(optional):

(Optional) Which issue(s) this PR fixes

@Ev4nFeng Ev4nFeng changed the title []feat[backend]: auto task op []feat[backend] auto task op Feb 26, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 21.76871% with 230 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...bservability/domain/trace/service/trace_service.go 1.03% 96 Missing ⚠️
backend/modules/observability/application/trace.go 0.00% 75 Missing ⚠️
backend/modules/observability/infra/repo/trace.go 0.00% 28 Missing ⚠️
...in/task/service/taskexe/processor/auto_evaluate.go 30.00% 6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...bservability/domain/trace/entity/loop_span/span.go 78.57% 5 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...s/observability/application/convertor/task/task.go 77.27% 5 Missing ⚠️
...dler/coze/loop/apis/observability_trace_service.go 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
.../modules/observability/infra/repo/ck/annotation.go 55.55% 2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...domain/task/service/taskexe/tracehub/subscriber.go 82.35% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...s/observability/domain/component/task/task_hook.go 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (21.76%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #435      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.83%   73.61%   -0.22%     
==========================================
  Files         626      627       +1     
  Lines       64821    65099     +278     
==========================================
+ Hits        47860    47924      +64     
- Misses      13711    13922     +211     
- Partials     3250     3253       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 73.61% <21.76%> (-0.22%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...d/modules/observability/domain/task/entity/task.go 55.76% <ø> (ø)
...bility/domain/trace/entity/loop_span/annotation.go 80.55% <ø> (ø)
...s/observability/domain/component/task/task_hook.go 50.00% <50.00%> (ø)
...domain/task/service/taskexe/tracehub/subscriber.go 73.85% <82.35%> (+1.06%) ⬆️
...dler/coze/loop/apis/observability_trace_service.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../modules/observability/infra/repo/ck/annotation.go 87.28% <55.55%> (-2.72%) ⬇️
...s/observability/application/convertor/task/task.go 81.11% <77.27%> (+0.13%) ⬆️
...bservability/domain/trace/entity/loop_span/span.go 81.78% <78.57%> (+1.89%) ⬆️
...in/task/service/taskexe/processor/auto_evaluate.go 85.19% <30.00%> (-1.72%) ⬇️
backend/modules/observability/infra/repo/trace.go 80.71% <0.00%> (-5.04%) ⬇️
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f27d2fb...fcfdeed. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant