Update README.md with project status - #271
Conversation
lol sorry too many words
| > | ||
| > stackstac still works and is used in production by many projects. For new projects or any needs, the actively maintained alternative is [`odc-stac`](https://github.com/opendatacube/odc-stac) instead. | ||
| > | ||
| > Anyone interested in helping maintain stackstac is welcome; see [#270](https://github.com/gjoseph92/stackstac/issues/270) for discussion. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Anyone interested in helping maintain stackstac is welcome; see #270 for discussion.
You probably don't want to advertise this - it seems inviting for supply chain attacks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fair - sorry for the late reply. Look good now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, this looks better to me. The maintainer doesn't seem to be very active though, so it's uncertain what will happen with this.
| > | ||
| > stackstac is no longer actively maintained — issues and PRs may not receive a response. | ||
| > | ||
| > stackstac still works and is used in production by many projects. For new projects or any needs, the actively maintained alternative is [`odc-stac`](https://github.com/opendatacube/odc-stac) instead. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
might be worth mentioning this project as another alternative
https://developmentseed.org/lazycogs/
it has favorable perf benchmarks relative to odc-stac: https://developmentseed.org/lazycogs/performance/#benchmark-results
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Goood call and apologies for the late reply. Look good now/?
|
@gjoseph92 Feedback addressed! |
3 participants
No description provided.