Skip to content

Conversation

@larsoner
Copy link
Contributor

@larsoner larsoner commented Dec 5, 2025

Consider this proposal-as-PR, feel free to close if out of scope or deemed not sufficiently useful. I was just using this for local debugging so thought it's possible others might need it, too.

I was getting some cache misses and didn't understand why. This adds a function to give a reason string why. I assumed it was a hash mismatch, but it's nice to know that joblib saw it that way so I could confidently debug the issue at my end.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 94.30%. Comparing base (4273f39) to head (f3b529a).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
joblib/memory.py 75.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1763      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.20%   94.30%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          46       46              
  Lines        7921     7924       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         7462     7473      +11     
+ Misses        459      451       -8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant