fix: tanstack start package

[farisaziz12]

🧭 Context

In this PR, we added TanStack to the list of frameworks. In this comment, @schiller-manuel pointed out that the referenced package is now considered stale.

📚 Description

Updating the referenced package to the current most popular one, @tanstack/react-start

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
docs.npmx.dev	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 23, 2026 6:43pm
npmx.dev	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 23, 2026 6:43pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
npmx-lunaria	Ignored		Feb 23, 2026 6:43pm

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request updates a package reference within the SHOWCASED_FRAMEWORKS array in app/utils/frameworks.ts. Specifically, the package name for the "tanstack start" entry is changed from '@tanstack/start-server-core' to '@tanstack/react-start'. This is a direct string value modification with no changes to function signatures, types, or control flow logic.

Possibly related PRs

• npmx-dev/npmx.dev PR 1523: Modifies the same SHOWCASED_FRAMEWORKS entry for "tanstack start" with related package name updates.

Suggested reviewers

• danielroe

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description check	✅ Passed	The PR description clearly relates to the changeset, explaining the context, rationale, and specific package update from '@tanstack/start-server-core' to '@tanstack/react-start'.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
• 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

app/utils/frameworks.ts (1)

65-68: LGTM — @tanstack/react-start is the correct, actively maintained package.

@tanstack/react-start is current on npm (latest 1.162.2, published 12 hours ago) and is the canonical install target per the official TanStack Start docs, confirming this replaces the stale reference appropriately.

One optional consideration: the name field remains the generic 'tanstack start', while package now specifically anchors to the React variant. @tanstack/solid-start exists as a separate framework-specific package, so if a Solid variant is ever added to this list, the current name could become ambiguous. Renaming to something like 'tanstack start (react)' would pre-empt that confusion, but this is purely a forward-looking nitpick.

---

ℹ️ Review info

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4e6e168 and f379d6c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• app/utils/frameworks.ts

[danielroe]

I already fixed it. the package currently in the code includes more downloads than the react version (as it is depended on by both react and solid versions)

[farisaziz12]

I already fixed it. the package currently in the code includes more downloads than the react version (as it is depended on by both react and solid versions)

But do we want to reference a sub-dependency of the frameworks or the framework itself?

on the page for @tanstack/start-server-core:

This package is not meant to be used directly. It is a dependency of the TanStack Start framework-specific packages.

imho it could confuse someone to point to something they should not use but references what they should use. WDYT?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!