New optional/recommended fields - applicant, owner(s)?

[ejaxon]

Here at the City of Asheville, we're using this as a starting point for building not just the open dataset for permits, but our internal "canonical representation" as well. Obviously we'll have fields that fall outside the standard, but a couple that strike me as generally relevant are applicant (who may be a contractor or may be the owner) and owner(s).

Do these make sense as at least optional fields in the standard?

[mheadd]

/cc: @axtheset @eddietejeda

[axtheset]

They definitively make sense as optional fields in the standard and should be considered for inclusion.

[Dreike-bot]

Yes