chore: open next Unreleased section

[github-actions]

Opens the next Unreleased changelog section after the verified release.

Created by the fleet release closeout stage.

[clawsweeper]

🦞👀
ClawSweeper picked this up.

Pull request received. I will update this pull request when review starts.

[clawsweeper]

Codex review: needs maintainer review before merge. Reviewed August 29, 2026, 11:53 AM ET / 15:53 UTC.

ClawSweeper review

What this changes

The PR adds an empty 0.9.4 Unreleased heading above the released 0.9.3 notes.

Merge readiness

⚠️ Ready for maintainer review - 1 item remains

This PR is still necessary: current main is the released 0.9.3 commit and does not yet contain a development heading for 0.9.4. The two-line, changelog-only change is consistent with the repository’s established post-release pattern and has no actionable defect.

Priority: P3
Reviewed head: d702247091b5e114a448b297e7bf12adc40bf81b

Review scores

Measure	Result	What it means
Overall readiness	🐚 platinum hermit (4/6)	A focused, convention-consistent documentation patch with no correctness or security findings.
Proof confidence	🌊 off-meta tidepool	Not applicable: Only CHANGELOG.md changes, so real runtime behavior proof is not applicable.
Patch quality	🐚 platinum hermit (4/6)	No actionable review findings were identified.

Verification

Check	Result	Evidence
Real behavior	Not applicable	Not applicable: Only CHANGELOG.md changes, so real runtime behavior proof is not applicable.
Evidence reviewed	5 items	Introduced change: The verified PR delta adds only the 0.9.4 Unreleased heading and blank separator at the top of the changelog. Release documentation: The repository’s release guide requires a changelog section before its protected-main release workflow, and lists CHANGELOG.md among release archive contents. Established closeout pattern: Changelog history contains the earlier automated post-release heading commit for the 0.9.1 development cycle, alongside the current equivalent change.
Findings	None	None.
Security	None	None.

How this fits together

Gitcrawl’s changelog is packaged with release archives and records shipped changes. After a verified release, release-closeout work opens a new development section for upcoming notes.

flowchart LR
A[Verified 0.9.3 release] --> B[Release closeout]
B --> C[Changelog]
C --> D[0.9.4 Unreleased section]
D --> E[Future release notes]

Loading

Before merge

• Complete next step (P2) - No repair lane is needed; the remaining action is ordinary maintainer approval of this focused changelog update.

Agent review details

Security

None.

Review metrics

None.

Technical review

Best possible solution:

Land the empty development heading so future 0.9.4 changes have one clear changelog destination.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Not applicable: the PR changes only a changelog heading, which is directly reviewable in the rendered source.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

Yes: opening the next Unreleased section follows the repository’s prior release-closeout pattern without changing runtime behavior or release tooling.

AGENTS.md: not found in the target repository.

Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning high; reviewed against 47232a77749f.

Labels

Label justifications:

• P3: This is a two-line documentation and release-closeout change with no runtime effect.
• rating: 🐚 platinum hermit: Overall readiness is 🐚 platinum hermit; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🐚 platinum hermit.
• status: 👀 ready for maintainer look: ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. Not applicable: Only CHANGELOG.md changes, so real runtime behavior proof is not applicable.

Evidence

What I checked:

• Introduced change: The verified PR delta adds only the 0.9.4 Unreleased heading and blank separator at the top of the changelog. (CHANGELOG.md:3, d702247091b5)
• Release documentation: The repository’s release guide requires a changelog section before its protected-main release workflow, and lists CHANGELOG.md among release archive contents. (docs/releasing.md:22, d702247091b5)
• Established closeout pattern: Changelog history contains the earlier automated post-release heading commit for the 0.9.1 development cycle, alongside the current equivalent change. (CHANGELOG.md:3, 48d45b40ecba)
• Current-main release boundary: The PR base is tagged v0.9.3; the new heading is absent from that current main/release commit, so the requested change is not already implemented. (CHANGELOG.md:5, 47232a77749f)
• Feature-history ownership: The latest commit was authored by steipete, while the prior post-release heading was created by the release automation; both are directly connected to this changelog workflow. (CHANGELOG.md:3, d702247091b5)

Likely related people:

• steipete: Authored the current heading commit and the release-preparation work immediately preceding this development cycle. (role: recent changelog and release contributor; confidence: high; commits: d702247091b5, 47232a77749f, 648098df8bf7; files: CHANGELOG.md, docs/releasing.md)
• github-actions[bot]: Authored the parent closeout commit and the prior equivalent post-release changelog heading. (role: automated release-closeout author; confidence: high; commits: fc133934245d, 48d45b40ecba; files: CHANGELOG.md)

Rating scale

Score	Internal tier	Crab rank	Meaning
6/6	S	🦀 challenger crab	Exceptional readiness
5/6	A	🦞 diamond lobster	Very strong readiness
4/6	B	🐚 platinum hermit	Good normal PR; ordinary maintainer review
3/6	C	🦐 gold shrimp	Useful, but confidence is limited
2/6	D	🦪 silver shellfish	Proof or implementation needs work
1/6	F	🧂 unranked krab	Not merge-ready
N/A	NA	🌊 off-meta tidepool	Rating does not apply

Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality.
Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

Workflow

• ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
• Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
• A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
• PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
• Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
• Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
• Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
• Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

History

Review history (1 earlier review cycle)

• reviewed 2026-08-29T15:17:13.095Z sha fc13393 :: needs maintainer review before merge. :: none