Skip to content

improve Combinator builder selection UI#1216

Open
ziaddevv wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
combinator-selection-ui
Open

improve Combinator builder selection UI#1216
ziaddevv wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
combinator-selection-ui

Conversation

@ziaddevv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

solves some error messages
+
fixes #1206 #1207 #1208

@ziaddevv
ziaddevv force-pushed the combinator-selection-ui branch from 87958c4 to e197963 Compare July 17, 2026 21:26
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.71%. Comparing base (54a73df) to head (e197963).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1216      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.61%   92.71%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          78       78              
  Lines        4969     4994      +25     
==========================================
+ Hits         4602     4630      +28     
+ Misses        367      364       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@audiodude audiodude left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one question, looks good otherwise. Good idea to bundle these fixes together.

Comment on lines 383 to +387
availableIncludeBuilders: function (project) {
return this.availableBuildersFor(project, this.includeBuilders);
return this.availableBuildersFor(project, this.selectedBuilderIds());
},
availableExcludeBuilders: function (project) {
return this.availableBuildersFor(project, this.excludeBuilders);
return this.availableBuildersFor(project, this.selectedBuilderIds());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These functionas are now identical, which indicates a design flaw of some sort. Or possibly a logic error? What code is calling these that expects separate *IncludeBuilders and *ExcludeBuilders, but both lists are the same? I would refactor that code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Combinator: Don't display "no builders" message if I've already added some

2 participants