Skip to content

Add clck.ai to whitelist#1800

Open
sokolyanskydev wants to merge 1 commit intophantom:masterfrom
sokolyanskydev:add-clck-ai-whitelist
Open

Add clck.ai to whitelist#1800
sokolyanskydev wants to merge 1 commit intophantom:masterfrom
sokolyanskydev:add-clck-ai-whitelist

Conversation

@sokolyanskydev
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sokolyanskydev sokolyanskydev commented Mar 23, 2026

clck.ai is a legitimate private service used for internal monitoring and reporting. It is not associated with phishing, impersonation, or any malicious activity.

Phantom currently flags it as suspicious — this appears to be a false positive, likely triggered by fuzzy matching.

Requesting addition to the whitelist.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added clck.ai to the whitelist.

False positive — legitimate private monitoring service.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 23, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: dc7dc200-b10c-4659-802e-48316d0bd9a9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f0e8ff9 and ec91052.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • whitelist.yaml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated whitelist.yaml to add a new whitelisted URL entry for clck.ai alongside the existing nftplus.io entry. File formatting was normalized to include a trailing newline.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration Update
whitelist.yaml
Added new URL entry clck.ai to the whitelist and normalized file ending with trailing newline.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title directly and accurately summarizes the main change: adding clck.ai to the whitelist, which matches the file modifications and PR objectives.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant