-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 983
Abstracted regex checker to a util function #1669
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ce7bc65
added name to package json
ifiok 1ac6008
updated parser to check for extended content type formats for JSON
ifiok 18ed8bd
added tests to validate change in accepting extended headers
ifiok 560b2d7
Merge branch 'master' into master
ifiok 6ede98e
updated bodyParser to treat *+json as application/json
ifiok ef5a15e
added test case to validate that */*+json content type is handled
ifiok 3b90f9e
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/ifiok/node-restify
ifiok c302a12
updated test name
ifiok f3517f2
added regext content type check for extend types to jsonbodyparser as…
ifiok a72d20b
Merge branch 'master' of git://github.com/restify/node-restify
ifiok e5d6fe0
added utility function for validating extended json content types
ifiok 2c9f9c7
extracted json content type checker to avoid duplicate implementations
ifiok File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | ||
| // Copyright 2018 Ifiok Idiang. All rights reserved. | ||
|
|
||
| 'use strict'; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Return the stripped content type string if it is a valid JSON extended type | ||
| * | ||
| * @public | ||
| * @function validateExtendedJsonContentType | ||
| * @param {String} contentType - the content type string to validate | ||
| * @returns {Boolean} validity flag | ||
| */ | ||
| function validateExtendedJsonContentType(contentType) { | ||
| var type = contentType.toLowerCase(); | ||
| // map any +json to application/json | ||
| var jsonPatternMatcher = new RegExp('^application/[a-zA-Z.]+\\+json'); | ||
| return jsonPatternMatcher.test(type); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| ///--- Exports | ||
|
|
||
| module.exports = validateExtendedJsonContentType; | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting to see this RegExp being rebuilt on every call to the function. I built a little test that ran this function with the RegExp declared outside the function and found it to be about 460% faster. Is there a reason to leave it declared in the function rather than as a module var?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here is the test script if interested:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No reason not to! @ifiok seems like something went awry with your branch history - hope you don't mind, but I took a stab over in #1670