Remove doc comments for generate_trait_from_impl

[A4-Tacks]

Input:

struct Foo(f64);

impl F$0oo {
    /// Add `x`
    ///
    /// # Examples
    fn add(&mut self, x: f64) {
        self.0 += x;
    }
}

This PR:

struct Foo(f64);

trait NewTrait {
    /// Add `x`
    ///
    /// # Examples
    fn add(&mut self, x: f64);
}

impl NewTrait for Foo {
    fn add(&mut self, x: f64) {
        self.0 += x;
    }
}

Old:

struct Foo(f64);

trait NewTrait {
    /// Add `x`
    ///
    /// # Examples
    fn add(&mut self, x: f64);
}

impl NewTrait for Foo {
    /// Add `x`
    ///
    /// # Examples
    fn add(&mut self, x: f64) {
        self.0 += x;
    }
}

[ChayimFriedman2]

I'm not sure this is preferred. r-a does show the doc comment from the trait if there is none on the impl, but sometimes it's nicer to have it on the impl as well.

Although they could go out of sync...

[A4-Tacks]

Add another assistant to add documents from the trait?

[A4-Tacks]

Add another assistant to add documents from the trait?

Ok

[ChayimFriedman2]

I've changed my opinion and I now like this PR. You can rebase and merge.

View changes since this review

[rustbot]

This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.