Skip to content

Conversation

@LucaMarconato
Copy link
Member

Parsing polygons for Xenium is now ~9x faster thanks to using from_ragged_array() and using plain numpy instead of pandas group_by.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 3, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 5.26316% with 18 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 37.15%. Comparing base (1431911) to head (7b73d33).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/spatialdata_io/readers/xenium.py 5.26% 18 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (1431911) and HEAD (7b73d33). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (1431911) HEAD (7b73d33)
3 2
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #365       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   62.98%   37.15%   -25.83%     
===========================================
  Files          27       27               
  Lines        3147     3154        +7     
===========================================
- Hits         1982     1172      -810     
- Misses       1165     1982      +817     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/spatialdata_io/readers/xenium.py 18.10% <5.26%> (-54.34%) ⬇️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants