[codex] Session 14 Turnfile closeout and PRD follow-through#1
Merged
Conversation
Draft PRD introducing two conflict/authority refinements: - rebuttal_rounds: configurable Level 2 loop bound (fixed counts, min 1, max unbounded) in TURNFILE.yaml; unbounded terminates on NO-NEW-OBJECTION convergence signal or Maintainer circuit-breaker - bound exhaustion escalates straight to Level 4 (skips Level 3) - binary gated/unlockable flag extending the PRD-018 authority matrix (unlock eligibility only; agent self-tags, Maintainer ratifies) Logs OQ-058-061 as resolved; registers PRD-021 in PRD_STATUS.json (draft, gates pending agent cross-review). Validator passes. Counter-recommendation model unchanged (OQ-061: no enumerate-only lane). Text-only scope held; no office-document workflow. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… PRD-017 Session 14 opened (Claude on Fable 5, model swap from Opus 4.6 with zero protocol migration). Feb-June coordination drift reconciled in WORKLOG. Maintainer triage decisions (mirrored in MSG-20260612-019): - PRD-018 (authority matrix) accepted and promoted to docs/prds - PRD-019 (mailbox-first approval) accepted and promoted; OQ-054/055 resolved: no time-based polling, coordination stays event-based - PRD-020 folded into PRD-017 as R7 and superseded; OQ-051/056/057 resolved - PRD-017 Maintainer-accepted; promotion held on Codex fold re-verify - PRD-002 and PRD-015 (+ Gemini onboarding package) deferred - Zero active open questions (OQ-051..061 all resolved) Tooling: validate-prd-promotion.mjs gains deferred/superseded terminal statuses so the registry records triage outcomes faithfully. Pending Codex: MSG-20260612-018 (PRD-021 cross-review), MSG-20260612-020 (PRD-017 R7 fold re-verify). TURNFILE.yaml at rev 32; all gates green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…s, baseline docs - BASELINE.md created; README rewritten with full PRD status index - Skill bundles migrated to role-keyed dirs (skills/claude/ v0.4.0 by Claude, skills/codex/ v2 by Codex); old paths deprecated in place - PRD-024 drafted (legibility invariant, tokenese sequencing gate): agent gates complete, Maintainer pending - PRD-023 drafted by Codex: Claude APPLY with 1 amendment (R4 exit path) - PRD-026 proposed by Codex: Claude APPLY with 2 counters (cross-ownership repair prohibition; standalone with PRD-014 boundary) - PRD-025 resolved by convergence: PRD-014 amendment path (first full rebuttal-loop convergence); s14-prd-014-amendment task registered - Collision/discipline ledger established (3 items, all resolved in-band) - Mailbox through MSG-027; TURNFILE rev 59; all validation gates pass Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…s complete PRD-024 (human-legibility invariant) Maintainer-accepted and promoted; R5 propagation: skills/claude v0.4.1, session-charter encoding-profile line, validator rule task registered. PRD-022 drafted + Codex amendment accepted (OQ-065 resolved). Codex applied all Claude counters on PRD-023/026/027. First live delivery-mirror posted (MSG-030). Rev 69; all gates green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… held Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…eline Maintainer-stated structure encoded as PRD-006 Amendment A1: proposer writes evals, counterpart implements, reviewer verifies, done means eval-green — acceptance no longer equals completion. Registry gains implementation layer; session-14 PRDs retrofitted (accepted, not actioned). evals/ added for PRD-021/022/024 at honest red baseline (16 fail / 4 pass). Handoff MSG-032. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…D collision ledgered Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…evidence improvements) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… ledgered Claude-side now on Opus 4.8 (3rd model generation this session, same protocol). - PRD-029 draft v2 accepted (agent gates complete): Codex peer amendments add freshness receipts, in-lock derivation sequencing (R1.4/R1.5), thread-mode unread-reset support (R5), OQ-068 resolved derivation-only. - Closed 6 settled threads (MSG-030/031/032/034/035/036); MSG-033 retained (Codex closure owner, PRD-028 v2 in flight). - Corrected stale self-owned task row s14-prd-022-draft (closure-drift). - Ledger item 6: thread-mode unread blindness — Codex's PRD-029 review sat unprocessed because it landed as a thread entry on Claude's own card, exactly the risk PRD-029 R5 was being drafted to fix. - Refreshed WORKLOG status block + live Maintainer Decision Queue. - Codex peer-corrected skills/STRUCTURE.md (model bundles not auto-deprecated). Rev 92; all gates green. Only open item blocked on Maintainer: PRD-028 OQ-067. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Maintainer-approved and Maintainer-moved deferred/superseded PRDs off the active draft shelf. Claude reconciled tooling + registry: - validate-prd-promotion.mjs: docs/archive/prds shelf with inverse invariant (archived PRDs must be terminal + non-promotable); listPrdFiles guards missing dirs - registry: 002/015/020 repointed; PRD-015 state drift fixed (draft -> deferred) - evals/archive-shelf.evals.mjs: hygiene guard (4 checks, green) Active draft shelf now holds only 027/028/029. Rev 96; all gates green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Maintainer named a persistent error: reasoning from memory before files. Correct for solo work, wrong for collaborative Turnfile where peers and the Maintainer mutate shared files between turns. New leading skill principle generalizes re-read-before-edit (write safety) to re-read-before-assert (answer safety). Root-cause fix for the stale-memory error class. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- MSG-037: corrected skills/claude-opus_4.6/DEPRECATED.md (Opus 4.6 not deprecated — Maintainer: nothing deprecated unless declared) - MSG-038: closeout held until PRD-028/029 fully done (A1 complete) - MSG-039: asked Codex to inspect skills/claude v0.5.0 Files-First and offered it to mirror in skills/codex (its call) Files-First paid off first use: surfaced 2 unread before posting over them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…040 sync PRD-029 proposer step (Claude): evals/prd-029.evals.mjs pins the next-state.mjs contract (flags, JSON output, freshness receipt, read-only); 9/10 red baseline. Task s14-impl-029 registered, handed to Codex (MSG-041). Actioned Codex's crossed MSG-040 (PRD-028/029 acceptance synced). Both PRDs Maintainer-accepted; implementation lanes open: Claude implements PRD-028, Codex implements PRD-029. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- tools/validate-tokenese-pairs.mjs (R11): pair-metadata, missing-English-source, blocking-state, and Tokenese-only-decision rejection; in-sync acceptance - docs/prds/PRD-024 R2: Tokenese paired artifacts row (R9 Band C amendment, Maintainer-authorized via PRD-028 acceptance) - registry: PRD-028 implementation eval-verified; Codex review requested (A1 step 7) Committed only PRD-028 files; Codex's concurrent docs/llm/ work left for Codex. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ion sync) Picked up unassigned s14-prd-014-amendment (Claude's lane — proposer of the amend-PRD-014 counter from the PRD-025 convergence). A1.R1 compaction set, A1.R2 projection sync, A1.R3 boundary vs PRD-026, A1.R4 gate suite, A1.R5 acceptance. Routed to Codex for apply-or-counter (MSG-043). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reciprocal of Codex's MSG-043 offer (peer norm mirrored both ways): boot-time verify executing model+surface is in docs/llm/MODEL_LEDGER.md before relying on compatibility claims; absence is not deprecation. Opus 4.8 added to MANIFEST tested_on (Opus 4.6 + Fable 5 + Opus 4.8). Ledger rows provided to Codex; its MODEL_LEDGER.md left untouched (uncommitted, its file). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…dger Three session-14 lessons converted from prose ledger to standing skill rules: - Concurrent Write Discipline (Derive, Don't Assume): write-side complement to Files First — derive written values from in-lock read, validator-expected is truth, lock whole batch, commit own paths only, IDs in-window - Active-turn closure-owner check (thread-mode replies don't raise unread) - Builder/reviewer separation as operating rule (decline self-implementation) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… via A1 Reviewed Codex's tools/next-state.mjs (correct, header-safe, read-only) as PRD-029 reviewer; APPROVE; filed done -> docs/prds, registry done, PRD-027 blocker cleared. R6.3 closed by skills/claude v0.6.0. Both pre-PRD-027 implementation PRDs now fully through the eight-step loop in both directions. MSG-046 notifies Codex of skill v0.6.0 with mirror suggestion. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…parallel) - Closed Claude-owned terminal messages 039/041/042 - Claude idle, unread 0, no locks - WORKLOG closeout entry; WORKLOG + signal compaction DEFERRED to next boot (PRD-014 R4 execute-or-defer — concurrent dual-agent close collision avoidance) - chat-claude.md session-14 close snapshot written - boot-claude rolled v7 -> v8 (v7 archived); current-state + carry-forward updated - Closeout gate suite green (lint, mailbox, promotion, evals, skills preflight) Committed Claude files + shared coordination only; left Codex's skills/codex, boot-codex, docs/llm, and PRD-028 filing for Codex's own commit. Push held. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Validation
Notes
PRD-027 remains held for Maintainer checkpoint after remaining non-PRD-027 follow-through. This PR is draft for maintainer review.