Skip to content

Format differences#141

Open
tbittar wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
feature/document-study-format-gap
Open

Format differences#141
tbittar wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
feature/document-study-format-gap

Conversation

@tbittar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@tbittar tbittar commented Apr 28, 2026

No description provided.

@tbittar tbittar requested a review from aoustry April 28, 2026 16:05
@tbittar tbittar linked an issue Apr 28, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
3 tasks
@tbittar tbittar force-pushed the feature/document-study-format-gap branch from 9cf0091 to d62b5d4 Compare April 30, 2026 11:49
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@aoustry aoustry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we can keep such comparisons internal for now? But this is definitely an AI analysis that we can run regularly!

| Path | GemsPy | Antares Simulator v10.1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Simulation parameters file | `input/optim-config.yml` | `parameters.yml` *(at study root)* |
| Scenario builder file | `input/scenariobuilder.dat` | `input/data-series/modeler-scenariobuilder.dat` |
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now GemsPy also follows the convention input/data-series/modeler-scenariobuilder.dat


**GemsPy layout:**
```
study/
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to be updated

Comment on lines +123 to +130
GemsPy — separate bounds (GemsPy-only extension):
```yaml
constraints:
- id: flow_limit
expression: flow
lower-bound: -capacity
upper-bound: capacity
```
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really??

| Feature | GemsPy (`input/optim-config.yml`) | Antares (`parameters.yml`) |
|---|---|---|
| Solver name field | `solver-options.name` (default: `highs`) | `solver` (**required**, no default) |
| Supported solvers | `highs` only | `sirius`, `scip`, `coin`, `xpress`, `glpk`, `highs`, `pdlp`, `gurobi` |
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think GemsPy supports other solvers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Keep track of input format difference between GemsPy and Gems C++ interpreter

2 participants