Skip to content

refactor: use slices.Backward to simplify the code#6058

Merged
boojack merged 1 commit into
usememos:mainfrom
blackflytech:main
Jul 1, 2026
Merged

refactor: use slices.Backward to simplify the code#6058
boojack merged 1 commit into
usememos:mainfrom
blackflytech:main

Conversation

@blackflytech

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There is a new function added in the go1.23 standard library, which can make the code more concise and easy to read.

More info can see golang/go#61899

Signed-off-by: blackflytech <blackflytech@outlook.com>
@blackflytech blackflytech requested a review from a team as a code owner June 30, 2026 16:41
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: abadd6fb-709e-43e1-b49b-cc1c4b933060

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1020060 and 42c0c64.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal/scheduler/middleware.go

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

In internal/scheduler/middleware.go, the manual reverse-index for loop in Chain is replaced with slices.Backward(middlewares), requiring a new slices import. Behavior is unchanged.

Middleware loop refactor

Layer / File(s) Summary
Use slices.Backward in Chain
internal/scheduler/middleware.go
Adds slices import and replaces the explicit for i := len(middlewares) - 1 loop with slices.Backward(middlewares) to iterate in reverse order.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the refactor to use slices.Backward.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is related to the change and explains the new slices.Backward helper.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@boojack boojack left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@boojack boojack merged commit 0820fc2 into usememos:main Jul 1, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants