Skip to content

fix(ftip): distinguish archive maximizers and correct reliability arithmetic [AGENT] - #179

Merged
utensil merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kepler/ftip-repair-r6-archive-reliability-20260908
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

utensil merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kepler/ftip-repair-r6-archive-reliability-20260908

Conversation

@utensil

@utensil utensil commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The archive example conflated the maximum of whole-chain mean scores with a per-task oracle. Keep the finite archive maximum, state its real-valued domain and attained maximizer, and separate eligibility under a named deployment configuration. The two-chain example now computes 1/2 for either fixed chain and 1 for task-dependent oracle selection; any implemented router remains a separately evaluated policy with its costs.

The selector bound now states membership in the same archive and a nonnegative approximation tolerance, with its proof. The grader example gives 99/101 overall agreement and zero agreement within the safety subgroup. Stable addresses, the wrapper/archive/reliability layers and neighboring domain conventions are preserved.

Validation: exact mathematical controls, all 22 existing prose tests and lint, full local build, rendered-output/prose checks, nine browser routes, and a visually inspected 237-page focused PDF passed. All 773 source files, 773 HTML payloads and the PDF are archived and verified against the candidate. A fresh independent adversarial review approved exact head 01df43cc4d0d1a7cd4dab29602c663b6f8094246 with no findings.

…thmetic [AGENT]

Define finite real whole-chain means on a nonempty task set and archive, and separate attainment from deployment eligibility. State selector membership and prove the finite approximation bound. Replace the disjoint-strengths claim with exact whole-chain and per-task oracle calculations, and correct aggregate agreement to 99/101 with zero safety-subgroup agreement.
@utensil
utensil merged commit 5505049 into main Sep 8, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant