Add @vercel/core-platform to .vercel.approvers - #266
Open
tajo wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-Authored-By: Vojtech Miksu <1387913+tajo@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds the
@vercel/core-platformteam to.vercel.approversalongside the existing@vercel/computeentry, soownership.vercel.shrecognizes both teams as owners of this repo.Follows the file's existing one-team-per-line
@org/teamformat. The existing entry is unchanged and un-reordered —@vercel/core-platformis appended on its own line (which also keeps the list alphabetical).Follow-up to #262, which introduced the file. This supersedes #263, which was stacked on #262's
ownershipbranch and got auto-closed when that branch was deleted on merge.🤖 Generated with Claude Code