Skip to content

Conversation

@tornaria
Copy link
Contributor

  • python3-Cython: patch for sage
  • sagemath: update to 10.8.
  • python3-cysignals: update to 1.12.6.
  • python3-cypari2: update to 2.2.4.
  • python3-gmpy2: update to 2.2.2.
  • python3-memory_allocator: update to 0.2.0.
  • m4ri: update to 20251207.
  • m4rie: better changelog
  • m4ri: update to 20260122.
  • m4rie: rebuild for m4ri-20260122.
  • brial: update to 1.2.15.
  • ntl: update to 11.6.0.
  • ntl: cross build.
  • flintlib: update to 3.4.0.
  • gap: update to 4.15.1.
  • eclib: rebuild for ntl and flintlib
  • singular: rebuild for ntl and flintlib
  • sagemath: fix some tests
  • sagemath: change sphinx

Testing the changes

  • I tested the changes in this PR: briefly

This is based on #58320, updating dependencies that would need rebuilding sagemath.

I'm in the process of testing.

Missing / TODO:

@tornaria
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dkwo you may want to try this.

In particular, I made ntl cross, could you make sure that cross built ntl works ok? We also need to adjust flintlib and singular templates so they are built with ntl on cross.

@dkwo
Copy link
Contributor

dkwo commented Jan 27, 2026

Amazing that you got ntl to cross build!
is it possible to merge that change (and the bumps of singular etc) as a separate pr?
this way i could try to build sage with those packages from void repos and test if it works.

@tornaria tornaria force-pushed the sagemath branch 2 times, most recently from ef3ad0c to aea2535 Compare February 7, 2026 01:08
@dkwo
Copy link
Contributor

dkwo commented Feb 9, 2026

This looks good to me.
@ahesford Perhaps this can be merged sometimes soon, so that at least sage is unbroken?

@ahesford
Copy link
Member

ahesford commented Feb 9, 2026

If this is ready to go, please clean up the commits (especially squashing the separate sagemath commits) and drop the "draft" badge.

@tornaria tornaria marked this pull request as ready for review February 11, 2026 03:25
@tornaria
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ahesford @dkwo this is now ready IMO.

Test failures are either transient (failed to download 'libpng-1.6.55_1' signature...) or some random failures in matrix_mod2_dense.pyx and matrix_integer_dense.pyx which have been around for a while and seem to get worse under load / CI.

@ahesford ahesford merged commit 23369f6 into void-linux:master Feb 11, 2026
5 of 8 checks passed
@tornaria tornaria deleted the sagemath branch February 11, 2026 18:33
@dkwo
Copy link
Contributor

dkwo commented Feb 11, 2026

@tornaria I have just rebuilt sage natively on aarch64, using cross ntl from void's repo: all tests pass and I can use sage in jupyter lab. Do you understand why the build is failing for x86_64* on the builders? it looks like it does not find maxima Program maxima found: NO and rebuilds it.

@dkwo
Copy link
Contributor

dkwo commented Feb 11, 2026

one difference is that on aarch64 maxima uses ecl.

@dkwo
Copy link
Contributor

dkwo commented Feb 11, 2026

also, on ci here Program maxima found: YES (/usr/bin/maxima)

@dkwo
Copy link
Contributor

dkwo commented Feb 11, 2026

Thanks!

@tornaria
Copy link
Contributor Author

The issue is that we need maxima-ecl on makedepends. When using -Q this is not a problem because maxima-ecl is on checkdepends.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants