Deprecate checks

Checks/PWR043/README.md

@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ end do
 
 * [PWR043 examples](https://github.com/codee-com/open-catalog/tree/main/Checks/PWR043/)
 
-* [PWR010: Avoid column-major array access in C/C++](../PWR010/README.md)
+* [PWR010: Avoid column-major array access in C/C++](../../Deprecated/PWR010/README.md)
 
 * [PWR039: Consider loop interchange to improve the locality of reference and enable vectorization](../PWR039/README.md)
 

Checks/PWR062/README.md

@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ end subroutine matmul
 
 * [PWR062 examples](https://github.com/codee-com/open-catalog/tree/main/Checks/PWR062/)
 
-* [PWR010: Avoid column-major array access in C/C++](../PWR010/README.md)
+* [PWR010: Avoid column-major array access in C/C++](../../Deprecated/PWR010/README.md)
 
 * [PWR039: Consider loop interchange to improve the locality of reference and enable vectorization](../PWR039/README.md)
 

Checks/_category_.json

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+{
+  "position": 2
+}

Checks/PWR010/README.md → Deprecated/PWR010/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
 # PWR010: Avoid column-major array access in C/C++
 
+> [!WARNING]
+> This check was deprecated in favor of [PWR039](../../Checks/PWR039/README.md)
+> and [PWR040](../../Checks/PWR040/README.md). This is because PWR010 can apply
+> to loops with multiple array accesses. When the stride is fixed, applying it
+> may break the other accesses, creating a conflicting situation. In contrast,
+> [PWR039](../../Checks/PWR039/README.md) and
+> [PWR040](../../Checks/PWR040/README.md) only apply when all accesses are
+> inefficient, which makes the check safe and actionable.
+
 ### Issue
 
 In the  C and C++ programming languages, matrices are stored in a
@@ -55,7 +64,7 @@ for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
 
 ### Related resources
 
-* [PWR010 examples](https://github.com/codee-com/open-catalog/tree/main/Checks/PWR010/)
+* [PWR010 examples](https://github.com/codee-com/open-catalog/tree/main/Deprecated/PWR010/)
 
 ### References
 

Checks/PWR033/README.md → Deprecated/PWR033/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,12 @@
 # PWR033: Move invariant conditional out of the loop to avoid redundant computations
 
+> [!WARNING]
+> This check was deprecated in favor of [PWR022](../../Checks/PWR022/README.md).
+> This is because PWR033 largely overlaps with
+> [PWR022](../../Checks/PWR022/README.md), but
+> [PWR022](../../Checks/PWR022/README.md) provides clearer actionable guidance
+> and better examples.
+
 ### Issue
 
 [Loop-invariant conditional](../../Glossary/Loop-unswitching.md) can be moved out of
@@ -103,7 +110,7 @@ end subroutine
 
 ### Related resources
 
-* [PWR033 examples](https://github.com/codee-com/open-catalog/tree/main/Checks/PWR033/)
+* [PWR033 examples](https://github.com/codee-com/open-catalog/tree/main/Deprecated/PWR033/)
 
 ### References
 

Checks/RMK001/README.md → Deprecated/RMK001/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
 # RMK001: loop nesting that might benefit from hybrid parallelization using multithreading and SIMD
 
+> [!WARNING]
+> This check was deprecated in favor of [PWR050](../../Checks/PWR050/README.md),
+> [PWR051](../../Checks/PWR051/README.md),
+> [PWR052](../../Checks/PWR052/README.md),
+> [PWR053](../../Checks/PWR053/README.md), and
+> [PWR054](../../Checks/PWR054/README.md). This is because RMK001 combined
+> multithreading and vectorization concerns into a single check. The highlighted
+> checks split these cases into more focused and actionable rules.
+
 ### Issue
 
 Use multi-threading and SIMD hybrid parallelization to maximize the parallel

Checks/RMK002/README.md → Deprecated/RMK002/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
 # RMK002: Loop nesting that might benefit from hybrid parallelization using offloading and SIMD
 
+> [!WARNING]
+> This check was deprecated in favor of [PWR053](../../Checks/PWR053/README.md),
+> [PWR054](../../Checks/PWR054/README.md),
+> [PWR055](../../Checks/PWR055/README.md),
+> [PWR056](../../Checks/PWR056/README.md), and
+> [PWR057](../../Checks/PWR057/README.md). This is because RMK002 combined
+> offloading and vectorization concerns into a single check. The highlighted
+> checks split these cases into more focused and actionable rules.
+
 ### Issue
 
 Use offloading to the GPU and SIMD hybrid parallelization to maximize the

Checks/RMK003/README.md → Deprecated/RMK003/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 # RMK003: potential temporary variable for the loop which might be privatizable, thus enabling the loop parallelization
 
+> [!WARNING]
+> This check was deprecated due to the lack of actionable guidance and examples.
+
 ### Issue
 
 Loop is a potential parallelization opportunity if it can be confirmed that

Checks/RMK007/README.md → Deprecated/RMK007/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
 # RMK007: Vectorization opportunity within a multithreaded region
 
+> [!WARNING]
+> This check was deprecated in favor of [PWR050](../../Checks/PWR050/README.md),
+> [PWR051](../../Checks/PWR051/README.md),
+> [PWR052](../../Checks/PWR052/README.md),
+> [PWR053](../../Checks/PWR053/README.md), and
+> [PWR054](../../Checks/PWR054/README.md). This is because RMK007 combined
+> multithreading and vectorization concerns into a single check. The highlighted
+> checks split these cases into more focused and actionable rules.
+
 ### Issue
 
 There is a SIMD vectorization opportunity within a multithreaded region.

Checks/RMK008/README.md → Deprecated/RMK008/README.md

@@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
 # RMK008: Vectorization opportunity within an offloaded region
 
+> [!WARNING]
+> This check was deprecated in favor of [PWR053](../../Checks/PWR053/README.md),
+> [PWR054](../../Checks/PWR054/README.md),
+> [PWR055](../../Checks/PWR055/README.md),
+> [PWR056](../../Checks/PWR056/README.md), and
+> [PWR057](../../Checks/PWR057/README.md). This is because RMK008 combined
+> offloading and vectorization concerns into a single check. The highlighted
+> checks split these cases into more focused and actionable rules.
+
 ### Issue
 
 There is a SIMD vectorization opportunity within an offloaded region.

Checks/RMK009/README.md → Deprecated/RMK009/README.md

@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
 # RMK009: Outline loop to increase compiler and tooling code coverage
 
+> [!WARNING]
+> This check was deprecated due to the lack of actionable guidance and examples.
+
 We are working on this remark and it will be available soon.

Deprecated/_category_.json

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+{
+  "position": 4
+}

Glossary/_category_.json

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+{
+  "position": 3
+}